As Travis writes below, the GOP has bet the farm on the maverick concept. But like most words, it has both positive and negative connotations. Would it be appropriate for a further examination of the word and the idea?
For while it can be a virtuous word, can it also not suggest risk, recklessness, whimsy, shooting from the hip, unmoored, lack of preperation, self-indulgence, immaturity, impetuousness, not playing well with others?
Are these traits that will make a successful leader, chief executive or President? In a body of 100, a maverick has its place. But as the chief?
Food for thought....