2008

Quick '08 Update

- Both Barack Obama and John Edwards gave speeches on poverty. Obama's focused on urban poverty at Town Hall Education Arts and Recreation Center (THEARC) in DC. Edwards spoke in Kentucky. I'll post direct links to the speeches when they're available.

- John McCain gave a speech today to the national convention of Christians United for Israel. Read it here.

- For those who believe in predictions, check out "Political Futures", Slate's comprehensive guide to all the big political prediction markets.

- Once more, candidates are using video to express their views on Iraq: Governor Bill Richardson calls for a new plan for Iraq in his latest TV ad entitled "Stand Up"; Chris Dodd discusses ending funding for the War in NH this past Sunday; and Hillary Clinton is sending a DVD to Iowa Democrats laying out, among other things, her plan for Iraq.

- Rudy Giuliani, who is in YouTube's YouChoose spotlight, announced his Georgia Regional Chairs. Here's hoping these announcements don't come back to haunt him.

- In advance of the Logo Network forum, Mike Gravel's posted a clip of him marching in the SF Gay Parade. Gravel states he was the only candidate who marched. (More on who was involved in this article from the San Francisco Chronicle).

- Elizabeth Edwards is featured in John Edwards' new TV ad entitled "30 years."

- Here is video of Bobby Schindler, Terry Schiavo's Brother, endorsing Sam Brownback for President.

- Unrelated Sam Brownback news: Brownback recently criticized Mitt Romney's new TV ad, "Ocean". Brownback argues that the ad's message is contradictory because of Romney's time on the board of Marriott International, a hotel which offers "in-room pornography." Check out "Ocean" below:

For more information on NDN's coverage of the 2008 Presidential election, click here.

Quick '08 Update

- As most of you know, Jim Gilmore ended his run for the presidency.

- The controversial conversation between Hillary Clinton and John Edwards after the NAACP forum has not gone away just yet. The Committee for a Unified Independent Party wrote a letter to DNC Chairman Howard Dean encouraging him to allow all candidates to participate in the debates. Joe Biden's blog weighed in as well.

- In this short YouTube video, Barack Obama is shown in Manchester, IA discussing what the 1st District of Iowa would gain by ending the war in Iraq. Be sure to watch the reactions of those in the audience as Obama goes through the itemized list.

- Ron Paul is the latest candidate to sit down for a Talk at the Google campus as part of its Candidates@Google series.

- John Edwards kicked off his "Road to One America" tour over the weekend with a trip to the Lower 9th Ward of New Orleans. (Note: Edwards announced he was running for President in the 9th Ward.)

- Through his Justice Advisory Committee, Rudy Giuliani will tout his support from conservative judges and legal advocates.

- Hillary Clinton kicked off her "Ready to Change, Ready to Lead" tour in New Hampshire over the weekend. Click here for more from the campaign's blog.

- Chris Dodd spoke at the Utah Democratic Party's Convention over the weekend. Check out his remarks in the video below:

For more information on NDN's coverage of the 2008 Presidential election, click here.

What's the Plan, Mr President?

In a new letter, Senate Democrats challenge the President to explain his foreign policy strategy:

The President

The White House

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

       Press reports today indicate that the National Counterterrorism Center, our government’s top counterterrorism experts, recently concluded that Al Qaeda has significantly rebuilt itself since 2001 and is now as strong as ever.  Earlier this week, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff stated he believes the country faces an increased chance of a terrorist attack this summer.  Additionally, today's Initial Benchmark Assessment Report outlines that the Iraqi government has failed to meet any of the key benchmarks they set for themselves, demonstrating that the war in Iraq continues to head in the wrong direction.  These developments are the latest troubling indicators that your national security strategy is making America less secure and has left America vulnerable to terrorist attack. 

      It has become increasingly obvious that the war in Iraq has only exacerbated the terrorist threat.  Iraq has now become what it was not before the start of the conflict there, namely a training ground and launching pad for a new generation of terrorists.  Your focus on Iraq has permitted Al Qaeda to gather strength elsewhere to the point where Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell recently concluded that the next attack on America most likely “would be planned and come out of the [Al Qaeda] leadership in Pakistan.”  Meanwhile, repeated and extended deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan have stretched our military to the breaking point and reduced readiness to levels not seen since Vietnam.  Finally, most Guard and Reserve units in our states no longer have the equipment they need to perform their tasks, either abroad or here at home in the event of a national emergency or a disaster.

       It is precisely because of our concerns about these developments that Senate Democrats have been pushing to rebuild and reequip our military, fully implement the 9/11 Commission’s recommendations, enhance our special operations and intelligence capabilities, and, perhaps most urgently, change your strategy in Iraq.  We are surprised that you and many congressional Republicans have resisted these efforts and concerned that you continue to do so.

      We ask that you immediately inform Congress through the appropriate channels of (1) the near-term steps your Administration has taken or plans to take to address Secretary Chertoff’s heightened concerns about the terrorist threat, and (2) the strategy to reverse the alarming growth of Al Qaeda and affiliated extremist groups.

      Thank you for your consideration of these views and we look forward to your prompt response.

       Sincerely,

      Harry Reid

      Richard J. Durbin

      Charles E. Schumer

      Patty Murray

I had some thoughts about all this this morning. 

A failed foreign policy

Morning shows and the am papers all leading with the story that Al Qaeda is regrouping, stronger than ever.  Sec. Chertoff was on Fox talking about the threat, so it seems as if this is a White House strategy to scare folks during the upcoming Senate debate. 

But is this is a good strategy? Doesn't it just reinforce that the Administration's foreign policy has been an utter failure in every way? Al Qaeda is stronger.  Iraq has failed, and will end up exporting chaos throughout the region and the world.  Our traditional allies in the Middle East and Pakistan are losing ground to radical elements.  Israel is weaker than before.  Iran is closer to having nuclear weapons.  Our standing in Latin America is at an all time low, and Hugo Chavez's influence is on the rise.  Russia is becoming an ever more important problem.  Afghanistan is not coming along as promised.  On trade liberalization  Doha has stalled, TPA expired and prospects for important trade agreements with South Korea and Columbia look dim.  No action has been taken on combating climate change, and our military has been severely degraded.  

Does the Administration really want to broaden this debate beyond Iraq?

I say "bring it on."

Quick '08 Update

- There is a lot of commentary coming from the Democratic candidates on the Iraq War. For those who may have missed it, here is Hillary Clinton's plan for ending the war. Joe Biden took his feelings on Iraq to the floor of the Senate in this video.

- Most likely an effort to counter the honest efforts of New York City firefighters, Rudy Giuliani released a statement touting his support from FDNY Commissioner Howard Safir and re-emphasizing his work on behalf of all firefighters.

- On a much lighter note, Barack Obama shares his thoughts on the upcoming Harry Potter book in this YouTube video.

- More on Rudy Giuliani: the New York Times has an interesting article on the impact of Senator David Vitter's association with the "D.C. Madam" on Giuliani's campaign.

- Governor Bill Richardson is in the YouChoose spotlight with the video below. As a former US Secretary of Energy, Richardson asks the YouTube community if it has the next big idea on energy.

For more information on NDN's coverage of the 2008 Presidential election, click here.

NDN in the Politico today on immigration reform

I'm quoted today in a Politico story on how the collapse of immigration reform may end up hurting the GOP in 2008.   Other examples of this story can be found by clicking on the immigration tag above and reading through previous entries in the section.   There should be little doubt that Hispanics already had blamed the GOP for the tone of the immigration debate before this year; that the Senate bill collapsed largely through the work of a handful of Republican Senators; that the already damaged GOP brand has been and will be further degraded in the Latino community, the fastest growing in the nation; and as in CA in the 1990s, the rejection of the GOP by Latinos could spell electoral doom for them nationally for a generation to come. 

You can find our statement on the collapse of the immigration bill here.

However, I'm not sure that my quotes in the final graph as are clear as I would have hoped.  What I was trying to say is that if Democrats want to take advantage of the GOP stumble it would be wise for them to do more than blame the GOP for the collapse of the immigration bill. Democrats will have to make it clear over the next two years that they will work to do more than play politics with the issue - they need to show that they can deliver on the promise to reform the immigration system.  This means spelling out, in detail, a plan, and doing everything they can to pass it, or at least make significant progress on it, now.  

What is the Democratic vision here? Do Democratic leaders want to return to the framework of McCain-Kennedy, rejecting the point sytem, the nutty guest worker plan and "touchback?" What about H1Bs and other programs for highly educated workers? Is there a set of principles that can bring together the Democrats in both chambers?

My argument in the Politico piece was that for Democrats to take full advantage of the great Republican stumble they will need to make clear what kind of immigration reform they are for, and commit to doing more than just talking about it in the months to come.  Just saying that Democrats are less bad than the Republicans is not a strong message to take to any community.  

NDN, Rob Shapiro in New York magazine on globalization

NDN Globalization Initiative Director Rob Shapiro is quoted prominently in a thoughtful John Heilemann column in New York Magazine this week.  An excerpt:

The pace of change being driven by globalization has only accelerated in the fourteen years since NAFTA’s passage. And the political backlash against that change has only grown more bellicose, potent, and mainstream. In 2006, a raft of Democratic Senate candidates—Ohio’s Sherrod Brown, Virginia’s Jim Webb, Montana’s Jon Tester—were elected in part because of their appeals to economic nationalism and their opposition to trade deals that reputedly sent countless jobs overseas. And the anti-globalization tenor of many House Democratic campaigns was even more pronounced. “In all my time in Washington,” says Rob Shapiro, chairman of the New Democrat Network Globalization Initiative and a key adviser to Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign, “I’ve never seen less support for open trade across this town than today."......

More broadly, the consensus among top-tier economists that underpinned the support for free trade has lately been rattled by a spate of revisionism. Alan Blinder of Princeton, a former vice-chair of the Federal Reserve and a staunch Democrat, has taken to arguing that the downsides of unfettered globalization may be far greater than standard doctrine has assumed—in particular, that offshoring and outsourcing may put as many as 40 million American jobs at risk in the next two decades. The Nobel laureate Paul Samuelson has joined the chorus, as has former Clinton Treasury secretary Larry Summers, who wrote recently that pledges to retrain workers displaced in the globalized economy are “pretty thin gruel” when it comes to allaying the fears of the middle class.

The rethinking going on among such economists is salutary, to be sure. There can hardly be any doubt any longer that globalization (fueled by rapid technological change) is, as Shapiro has written, “weakening the long-standing connection between increases in the productivity of workers and the wages they earn.” But what makes the responses to this new reality among the Blinders and Summerses of the world welcome is that their arguments tend to be complex, careful, and nuanced. What none of them is advocating is any form of protectionism—even though that is precisely what many of the politicians and union leaders now seizing on the rethinking have in mind. Instead, the economists favor grand-scale education reform, worker training, R&D spending, and changes in the tax code to promote the creation of high value-added U.S. based jobs, and, not least, universal health care reform to bring down costs for domestic businesses.

“The next administration has a responsibility to create a new bargain on trade,” says Shapiro. “The bargain is, we will continue to expand open trade and we will make the significant investments required to enable American workers to benefit from it.”

Given Shapiro’s roots, it’s not surprising that his new bargain embodies the spirit of Clintonism (Bill Clintonism, that is). What’s often forgotten about Clintonomics, in its original incarnation, is that its theme was “putting people first.” Yes, there was always a commitment to fiscal discipline. Yes, there was the embrace of internationalism. But there was also a promise to sink massive sums into the formation and enhancement of human capital. But Clinton’s human-capital agenda was sacrificed on the altar of budget balancing, a sacrifice that was arguably unnecessary had the president and his people been willing to take on corporate welfare, congressional pork, and entitlement spending.

Now comes a golden opportunity for a presidential candidate prepared to do just that. Ready, that is, to make good on Bill Clinton’s unfinished agenda. Without question, the candidate most suitable to taking up the task, for reasons of both temperament and historical-cum-marital continuity, would be Hillary Clinton. Doing so would require her, however, to drop the cheap posturing as a trade hawk and adopt instead a stance of, I dunno, a genuine third-way leader. Those of us who care about getting globalization right will be watching and egging her on. And so, one hopes, will be her husband, who happens to understand all of this as well as anyone alive.

For more on NDN's Globalization Initiative, visit www.ndn.org.

Iraqi government warns of regional chaos

From the Times:

BAGHDAD, July 9 — The Iraqi foreign minister, Hoshyar Zebari, warned today that an early American withdrawal from Iraq could bring on an all-out civil war and regional conflict, pointedly telling the United States that it had responsibilities to continue lending support to the Baghdad government.

Mr. Zebari also asserted that Iraq’s neighbor Turkey had massed 140,000 troops near his country’s northern border and urged it to resolve differences with dialogue, not through force.

Mr. Zebari was speaking after a violent weekend in which more than 220 people were killed in Iraq, including 150 by a truck bomb in one of the deadliest single attacks since the American invasion in March 2003.

Asked if the Iraqi government’s was aware of the growing pressure on President Bush from Congress to impose a timetable for withdrawing American forces from Iraq, Mr. Zebari said his government was holding a “dialogue” with some congressmen.

“We explain to them the dangers of a speedy withdrawal and leaving a security vacuum, and the dangers vary from civil war to dividing the country or maybe to regional wars,” he said.

“Some people might disagree with this assessment, but in our estimation the danger is huge. Until the Iraqi forces and institutions complete their readiness, there is a responsibility on the U.S. and other countries to stand by the Iraqi government and the Iraqi people to help build up their capabilities.”

Mr. Zebari’s comments came after some Sunni and Shiite leaders called on Iraqi civilians to take up arms to defend themselves, amid frustration that Iraqi security forces had failed to halt the deadly suicide attacks....

Quick '08 Update

- Be sure to check out MoveOn's Virtual Town Hall, featuring the Democratic candidates views and policies on climate.

- Ron Paul not only has more cash on hand than John McCain, but also more views on his YouTube channel. (Update: Barack Obama now has 7.3 million views and Ron Paul has 2.2 million)

- Like many of the candidates, John Edwards promoted Live Earth over the weekend

- Mike Huckabee showed his musical ability in Iowa.

- Barack Obama launched a new blog on his website dedicated to health care policy. Its purpose is to invite "Americans across the country to engage in an open discussion of America's health care system."

- Rudy Giuliani is all about fiscal discipline and cutting taxes according to recent speeches he gave in Jacksonville, FL and Savannah, GA.

- In a recent video interview, Joe Biden discussed a range of issues including his views on the recent immigration bill, Fred Thompson, and the Iraq War and Republican defection over it.

- Dennis Kucinich released a statement taking Hillary Clinton to task for her participation (or lack thereof, according to Kucinich) in a United Steelworkers conference that took place in Kucinich's native Cleveland. In the same statement, he praised John Edwards for his position on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

- Team Tancredo officially launched Tancredo's Take on YouTube.

For more information on NDN's coverage of the 2008 Presidential election, click here.

White House considering changing its Iraq Strategy

David Sanger of the Times has a huge front page story about internal deliberations in the White House.  It starts:

White House officials fear that the last pillars of political support among Senate Republicans for President Bush’s Iraq strategy are collapsing around them, according to several administration officials and outsiders they are consulting. They say that inside the administration, debate is intensifying over whether Mr. Bush should try to prevent more defections by announcing his intention to begin a gradual withdrawal of American troops from the high-casualty neighborhoods of Baghdad and other cities.

Mr. Bush and his aides once thought they could wait to begin those discussions until after Sept. 15, when the top field commander and the new American ambassador to Baghdad are scheduled to report on the effectiveness of the troop increase that the president announced in January. But suddenly, some of Mr. Bush’s aides acknowledge, it appears that forces are combining against him just as the Senate prepares this week to begin what promises to be a contentious debate on the war’s future and financing.

Four more Republican senators have recently declared that they can no longer support Mr. Bush’s strategy, including senior lawmakers who until now had expressed their doubts only privately. As a result, some aides are now telling Mr. Bush that if he wants to forestall more defections, it would be wiser to announce plans for a far more narrowly defined mission for American troops that would allow for a staged pullback, a strategy that he rejected in December as a prescription for defeat when it was proposed by the bipartisan Iraq Study Group.

“When you count up the votes that we’ve lost and the votes we’re likely to lose over the next few weeks, it looks pretty grim,” said one senior official, who, like others involved in the discussions, would not speak on the record about internal White House deliberations....

Syndicate content