Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) continues to reiterate his opinion on the upcoming Congressional Review Act vote of the EPA’s mercury and air toxics standard. Alexander believes that, in an action of compromise, the rules should just be delayed, and has partnered with Senator Mark Pryor (D-AK) on presenting that stance. Alexander sees some merit to some of the clean air rules within the EPA regulations, such as the MATS and Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, because they have prevented “dirty air from blowing into Tennessee,” a state surrounded by more heavy coal producing states than any other.
A New York Times editorial piece delved into Mitt Romney’s “energy Etch A Sketch” policies over the weekend. While serving as governor of Massachusetts, Romney previously endorsed the closing of major coal plants, embraced wind and solar energy, and supported the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Now Romney is a staunch fossil fuel champion, climate change skeptic, and sworn enemy of the much maligned EPA. From his time as governor to the 2008 and 2012 campaigns, Romney has either changed or completely reversed his course on environmental issues, often in a direction that is disastrously hurtful for the future of the environment and the planet. Romney is quick to shake his hypocritical Etch A Sketch policies clean and redraw new ones for political gain—a scary willingness to have for a potential president.
Tom Fowler wrote a piece in the Wall Street Journal on replacing gasoline with natural gas in automobiles. Natural gas vehicles would generate cleaner emissions and the fuel is substantially cheaper than gasoline. Although barriers remain, Fowler contents that development of the technology is the right direction for the industry.
An important first technological hurdle is the fuel tank. Natural gas must be stored in a pressurized tank, making it heavier and bigger than gas tanks, and also driving up costs. But one of the most pressing issues isn’t technology at all—it’s consumers overcoming the obstacle of initial price-point and fuel convenience. A bigger market would bring prices down, and consumers may not realize that the savings in the long term can be generous. But those savings cannot come if you cannot find a station to fill up at. The public natural gas filling stations that dot the country are few and far between, and in-home filling devices have steep costs that turn buyers off. Research is being done to convert natural gas into a liquid that can be pumped at normal filling stations and used in conventional engines, but again the development costs are too much to make enough sense.
Finally, consumers tend to think “electric” when thinking of alternative fuel vehicles. It will take strong efforts to get the idea of natural-gas vehicles in to the minds, and then into the garages, of consumers. A domestic fuel product with a low price-point might be enough to get a hold in the market.