FCC Chair Julius Genachowski gave a pretty big speech (pdf) at Brookings yesterday, laying out two new principles to protect the openness of the internet, and throwing his weight behind net neutrality. There's all kinds of debate flying through the tubes right now-- on both sides of Genachowski-- but I'm going to stay out of all that, and instead share a few thoughts on how these principles might apply (or not) outside the U.S.
Granted, in most of the developing world, preserving the openness of the internet will take a backseat to broadening access for some time. Unfettered access to BitTorrent isn't worth much if you're confined to a feeble mobile connection and the nearest broadband access is a day away. But as high speed networks arrive in places like Ghana, Nigeria and Kenya, these countries will face the same quandaries we're confronting in Washington.
If anything, protecting open access to the web will be more important throughout Africa, Asia, and Latin America. In most countries, the population is much more rural, and anti-trust laws are much weaker-- two factors that would contribute to less competition and a surfeit of power for a very few ISPs. Already, VOIP applications like Skype, which are widely used around the world, have been targeted for throttling due to their high bandwidth requirements. For the sake of the innovation and entrepreneurship these applications enable, it would seem important to keep them open and available.
Questions of enforcement are more difficult. For a government to effectively monitor an ISP to ensure openness would require a very tech-savvy team, something many resource-poor governments would struggle to maintain. Perhaps there will be space for an international body-- an NGO, or perhaps even a for-profit company-- to protect web openness on a contract basis on behalf of governments incapable of doing so themselves.
Countries like Iran and China are, of course, a separate challenge. I'm not one to meddle in another state's sovereign affairs, but as someone with a history of being censored in China, I tend to see denial of access on par with any other violation of the freedom of the media.
Just a few opening thoughts in the hopes of provoking a conversation or a bit of disagreement.
One more thing-- Dr. Rob Shapiro, Chair of the Globalization Initiative here at NDN, just came out with an economic study (pdf) on "flexible broadband pricing"-- i.e., charging high-volume web users more for their access. I imagine the concept would offend some apostles of net neutrality, but the study makes a pretty compelling case that such progressive pricing would help close the digital divide here in the U.S. (and, surely, elsewhere).